OKR Intelligence Platform

Goal Intelligence for Structured Execution

Align company, team, and individual goals through structured OKR design, execution risk prediction, and Impact scoring that transforms goal setting into a measurable performance system.

Book a Demo
GroSum - Goal Intelligence
COMPANY OKR
Increase customer retention to 95%
72% On Track
KR: Reduce churn to <5% 80%
KR: NPS score > 60 45% ⚠
KR: 100% onboarding success 90%

OKR Generation Engine

Generate structured, role-aligned OKRs based on company priorities and historical performance patterns. Built-in quality scoring ensures clarity, measurability, and strategic alignment before goals are finalized.

  • Role-specific OKR suggestions from company priorities
  • Key results that are measurable, time-bound, and aspirational
  • OKR quality scoring: measurability, ambition, clarity
  • Learns from successful OKRs in your organization over time
OKR Generator
System Suggested Role: Product Manager · Q2 2026
O: Improve product-market fit Quality: 92/100
📊 KR1: Achieve 40% feature adoption rate (current: 22%)
📉 KR2: Reduce monthly churn to <3% (current: 5.2%)
🎙️ KR3: Conduct 50 user interviews with decision-makers
O: Accelerate delivery velocity Quality: 88/100
🚀 KR1: Ship 12 features/quarter (current pace: 7)
⏱️ KR2: Reduce sprint cycle time by 30%
🛡️ KR3: Zero P0 production incidents
Accept Both Regenerate Customize
🔍 Why These OKRs?
Generated using company priority: "Retention Growth" · Past top-performing PM OKRs · Benchmark data from similar roles · Current churn trend (5.2% → target 3%)
Confidence Score: 87% alignment with Q2 company objectives

Smart Alignment Detector

Visualize goal alignment across Company → Team → Individual layers. Detect orphan objectives, cross-team conflicts, and structural misalignment before execution risk compounds.

  • Visual alignment tree: Company → Team → Individual
  • Detects orphan OKRs disconnected from company goals
  • Identifies goal conflicts between teams
  • Suggests missing alignment: 'This OKR could link to Marketing Q2'
Goal Alignment Map
🏢 Retain 95% customers
Product: Ship v2.0
API: 90% coverage
UX: Redesign
CS: NPS > 60
Support: <2hr SLA
2 Orphan OKRs Detected
"Improve social media presence" (Marketing) and "Reduce build time" (DevOps) aren't linked to any company objective.
Suggest Alignment
📊 Alignment Health Score
Overall structural alignment: 78%
Risk increases when alignment drops below 65%. 2 teams currently partially disconnected from company objective.

OKR Risk Predictor

Predict execution probability using check-in velocity, historical goal performance, and behavioral signals. Surface early risk indicators and recommended intervention timing.

  • Predicts achievement probability for every key result
  • Traffic light: Green / Yellow / Red with confidence scores
  • Early warning alerts to managers with intervention timing
  • Root cause: 'Low check-in frequency correlated with miss'
OKR Risk Dashboard
Q2 2026 - Week 6 of 13
Feature adoption → 40%
Current: 31% · Velocity: +2%/wk
89%
likely hit
Reduce churn → <3%
Current: 4.1% · Slowing
52%
at risk
50 user interviews
Current: 12 · No check-ins in 3 wks
23%
likely miss
Intervention Alert
User interviews stalled - no check-in in 3 weeks. Root cause: researcher on leave, no backup assigned. Action needed this week to recover.
📈 Risk Drivers Identified
• Check-in frequency below team average (−42%)
• Resource dependency unresolved (Design team overload)
• Historical pattern: Similar KRs missed in Q1 cycle
Model confidence: 81%

Check-In Coach

Maintain execution discipline through intelligent check-in prompts, sentiment pattern detection, and structured weekly summaries that highlight blockers and momentum shifts.

  • Smart nudges: 'You haven't updated KR2 in 2 weeks'
  • Auto-generated prompts based on key result type
  • Sentiment analysis: detects frustration and blockers
  • Weekly summary: achievements, blockers, team health
AI Check-In Coach
Week 6 Summary - Product Team
🎉 Achievements (8)
Dashboard v2 shipped · API coverage hit 85% · 3 user interviews completed · Mobile prototype approved
🚧 Blockers (3)
Design resources unavailable · Third-party API rate limits · User interview pipeline stalled
📬 Nudges Sent This Week
"Arjun: User interviews KR hasn't been updated in 3 weeks" · "Sarah: Sprint cycle time data needed"
💡 Sentiment Flag
Arjun's check-in tone has shifted from positive to frustrated over 3 weeks. Manager: consider a 1:1 focused on support needs.
🧠 Coaching Insight
Team momentum trending downward (−12% engagement shift over 3 weeks). Recommend manager 1:1 intervention before Week 8 to avoid cascading delay.

Goal Impact Scoring

Score objectives based on predicted business impact versus execution effort. Identify high-leverage priorities and de-risk low-impact work through structured impact analytics.

  • Scores OKRs on predicted business impact vs. effort
  • Recommends priority focus areas per employee
  • Quarterly retrospective: which goal patterns worked?
  • Benchmarks against similar roles in the organization
Impact Analysis
OKR Impact vs Effort Matrix
Effort →
Impact →
KR1
KR2
KR3
KR4
Focus Recommendation
KR1 (Feature adoption) is high-impact/low-effort - prioritize this. KR4 (Build docs) is low-impact/medium-effort - consider deprioritizing.
📊 Portfolio View
62% of current OKRs fall into high-effort / low-impact quadrant. Optimizing focus could improve projected business outcome by 18%.
Based on impact model trained on prior 4 performance cycles.